跳到正文
原文
Psychological Bulletin·· 23 天前精选AI 评分78

情境挫折、需求剥夺与行为补偿的统一过程模型:一项元分析综述

Toward a unified process model of situational frustration, need deprivation, and behavioral compensation: A meta-analytic review.

AI 导读

一项发表于《Psychological Bulletin》的元分析综述整合了884个样本、共2,883个效应(总N=621,425),检验情境挫折经需求剥夺进而引发行为补偿的过程模型。

推荐理由

该元分析整合884个样本、62万余人数据,为情境挫折—需求剥夺—行为补偿链条提供量化证据,并提示样本以西方为主的外部效度限制。

摘要

The literature on situational frustrations, need deprivations, and behavioral compensations spans numerous research areas, such as the literature on social exclusion, intergroup frustrations, goal obstruction, and economic hardship, just to name a few. Here, we integrate this literature (2,883 effects from 884 samples; total N = 621,425). Samples were predominantly drawn from Western contexts (87.56%), with more limited representation from non-Western contexts. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling supports the basic model where situational frustrations link to need deprivation and subsequently compensation. Moderator analyses using random-effects models support a purposeful compensation lens showing that individuals are strategic and purposeful in matching their behavioral compensation to the strength of the frustration (i.e., they will not overreact) and are more likely to compensate within the same domain and toward the target that caused their frustration. Still, people sometimes compensate at a different level of the frustration and focus on a different need than the need/level that was frustrated. By emphasizing the interplay between tactical adjustments (e.g., switching needs or levels) and strategic alignment (e.g., preserving the goal and domain), we highlight the complex but purposeful nature of compensatory behaviors. We discuss the need for future integration and extension of the database and provide means to do so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

中文翻译还没有生成,先显示原文。

来源:Psychological Bulletin · doi.org