跳到正文
原文
arXiv · Signal Processing· Timothy Odonga, Jeanne M. Powell, Claire Bae, Yumeng Tan, Christine D. Esper, Stewart A. Factor, J. Lucas McKay, Hyeokhyen Kwon·· 8 天前精选AI 评分62

可穿戴步态冻结检测存在表型相关偏差,多站点迁移学习可部分缓解

Evidence for Phenotype-Driven Disparities in Freezing of Gait Detection and Approaches to Bias Mitigation

AI 导读

依据arXiv预印本摘要(尚未完成同行评审),研究者在4个公开可穿戴数据集(145名受试者、59.8小时记录)上评估了步态冻结(FOG)检测模型的偏差与公平性,发现模型在年龄、性别、病程以及FOG表型上均存在明显偏差(DPR与EOR均低于0.8)。

推荐理由

该预印本在4个公开可穿戴数据集上量化了步态冻结检测模型在表型与人口学分组间的公平性差距,并比较了四类缓解策略,为可穿戴健康监测的偏差评估提供了可参考的实证范围。

摘要

arXiv:2502.09626v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Freezing of gait (FOG) is a debilitating feature of Parkinson's disease (PD) and a common cause of injurious falls. Recent advances in wearable-based human activity recognition (HAR) have enabled FOG detection, but bias and fairness in these models remain understudied. Bias is defined as a systematic error leading to unequal outcomes, while fairness refers to consistent performance across subject groups. Biased models could systematically underserve patients with specific FOG phenotypes or demographics, widening care disparities. We evaluated the bias and fairness of state-of-the-art HAR models for FOG detection across FOG phenotypes and patient demographics using 4 public wearable datasets (145 subjects and 59.8 hours of recording) with multiple on-body sensor locations and temporal annotations on FOG episodes across various behavioral test protocols. Four mitigation approaches were assessed: conventional methods (threshold optimization and adversarial debiasing) and two transfer learning-based approaches (multi-site transfer and fine-tuning pre-trained models). Fairness was primarily quantified using the demographic parity ratio (DPR) and the equalized odds ratio (EOR). HAR models exhibited substantial bias (DPR & EOR < 0.8) across age, sex, disease duration, and critically, FOG phenotype. This phenotype-specific bias is particularly concerning as tremulous and akinetic FOG may require different clinical management. Conventional methods failed: threshold optimization (DPR=-0.126, EOR=+0.063) and adversarial debiasing (DPR=-0.008, EOR=-0.001). In contrast, multi-site transfer learning improved fairness (DPR=+0.037, p<0.01; EOR=+0.045, p<0.01) and performance (F1-score=+0.020, p<0.05), though neither metric reached 0.8. Transfer learning across diverse datasets may partially mitigate these disparities, helping wearable-based FOG monitoring benefit all individuals with PD.

中文翻译还没有生成,先显示原文。

来源:arXiv · Signal Processing · arxiv.org